As some of you may know, I have recently been making a range of videos about topics that I think are important for Malaysia to discuss, namely the 3 R’s.

Recently, the user ​⁠@coldsunflares asked me on my YouTube channel and my video about the penunggang agama Rayyan Wong who recently accused PMX and our Agong of eating in a non-halal restaurant about what I would do differently from the Madani Government when it comes to regulating what some may call extremism or penunggang agama. 

It was quite a thoughtful comment, and I reproduce it here. 

“You mentioned the government’s inability to deal with these kinds of issues, which for the most part, is true. However, how would you propose they deal with it? Because any time the government decides to take these so-called “decisive action”, they are labelled as “draconian, stifling freedom of speech” among other things. On one hand, the government is hard pressed to take these measure because of their history of championing reforms, equality and civil liberty, but on the other are those “from the other side” who hides behind the guise of freedom of speech (without decorum) to spread malicious statements, as is evident from multiple recent incidents, i.e. China flag issue, mandatory Halal cert, etc. We are bursting at the seams with people who point out the problem, but not so much people who can come up with a feasible solution to these issues.”

The comment I wrote was too long for the margins of the comment window, and after I had written it I realized – it was too long even for the YouTube post window, so here it is in full blog entry glory. 

Response begins: 

I think even now, the Madani government is having huge problems with actually portraying itself as a compassionate government – but I feel that this is because it does not fully understand itself. 

In this comment, you will see how I think of compassion and how I would define and operationalize it in the context of Madani, and how I would interpret and address the problems while at the same time maintaining compassion and inclusiveness while at the same time ensuring that we cannot be exploited by bad actors. 

WHAT IS MADANI’S GAME PLAN/GOAL?

I believe in its ideal form, the Madani governance strategy is one that fosters a compassionate, inclusive, and resilient society by emphasizing the rule of law, education, and open communication while safeguarding national unity and societal integrity. 

It combines firm, decisive measures against exploitation and harm with sustained efforts to build mutual understanding, trust, and the capacity for self-regulation within society.

This strategy involves three pillars:

1. Decisive and Transparent Governance: Enacting and enforcing clear, evidence-based laws to deter harmful behaviors such as extremism and religious exploitation (menunggang agama) while ensuring fairness and accountability with an eye towards restorative justice while never compromising on firmness. 

2. Collaborative Civil Society Engagement: Partnering with non-governmental organizations (NGOs), educators, and communities to cultivate a culture of critical thinking, harmony, and shared responsibility.

3. Holistic Education and Public Awareness: Equipping citizens with the tools to discern misinformation, engage constructively, and participate meaningfully in public discourse.

I think actualizing the values of the Madani government requires not just the government, but also civil society to play a role – I will talk about first the government, then civil society, in that order, both about the broader question of 3R content and to the idea of menunggang agama. 

Government:

A. Legal framework. 

If I were the government starting anew (assume something like the Sedition Act and CMA1998 does not exist), I would begin establishing the necessary legal framework to ensure that any form of 3R out of bounds speech can be eliminated, and moreover define what can or cannot be said under the law in a sufficiently broad way to ensure that we can account for the broad varieties of harmful language or expressions or means of causing harm within our society – oh how nice, we have the Sedition Act and the CMA1998. 

How can it be used to ensure that selective fitnah and misinterpretations of religion can be avoided, and how shall the courts decide that someone may cause sufficient public harm that their actions should not be tolerated? That’s a separate matter. 

I would then proceed to ensure that the country has the necessary links with social media networks and companies in charge of these platforms to ensure that there are rapid solutions and frameworks for dealing with Coordinated Inauthentic Behavior or otherwise and from there ensure that these frameworks can be made use of for rapid identification and control specifically of this type of behavior – i.e. there should be a framework such that the government should have the right to request data when behavioral patterns fall into specific kinds of categories such as internet brigading, masquerading as somebody else, etc, to address the problem through a technological aspect that is systemic and inbuilt and that insulates against incursions of our social fabric programmatically rather than through synchronous intervention, with an applicable record of actions taken under any regulatory regime. 

An Elected Representative I know personally told me that she advocates for one person one account, but I don’t think we need to go that far – or there needs to be a good regime for dealing with legitimate uses of multiple profiles in business context or otherwise, or perhaps an integration at a later point between social media entities and government databases assuming the appropriate transnational and multijurisdictional regulatory regime.

I would then proceed to establish, through communication and very clearly through actual engagement (not the fake engagement that Madani did), why such laws are needed to deal with our society, highlighting the actual scale and scope of the problems that we face and how at this juncture we need to address them. This is key for establishing trust and needs to be done clearly – no Rafizi going out and suddenly screaming about PN cyber troopers without any evidence (although PN cybertroopers certainly exist – see some of my other videos) and fighting with Lim Sian See – cold, hard evidence. 

B. Enforcement. 

Our deputy unity minister has opined that our existing legal framework is sufficient for dealing with dangerous speech, and the question is enforcement. 

Let us suppose that she is correct and proceed from there.

For enforcement, I would take the principle of “shock and awe” – to overwhelm with complete dominance… For only a moment. Think of it as the analogy of an injection to cause pain that is gone in a brief while with aftercare, but that results in extreme consequences on a mass scale to people who wish to challenge our nation’s fabric but only over a brief time, done on a theatrical but not sterilized manner – preferably, an entertaining one. 

I would do so by gathering evidence in the context of the necessary framework, then upon having gathered the necessary information, proceed to do a gigantic fell swoop mass enforcement where ideally, we can catch a large number of people at the same time who are responsible for 3R OR menunggang agama. 

But catching them is not enough. 

I would advocate massive scale public shaming, confessions, and content. Reveal their names, faces, ages, professions in a clear way that ensures that anyone who attempts to challenge our democratic fabric does not get away without consequences and be clear to communicate with people and assure the Malaysian people that every subsequent attempt to do something like this harms our society, and do it in such a way that it becomes profoundly clear that even if there is compassion in society, we cannot tolerate the intolerant – that as a whole society, to be a compassionate society, we must, if and as it is necessary, take measures to neutralize those amongst us who do not choose to be compassionate. 

However, punishment is not enough. 

There must be mechanisms for restorative justice. 

After having been punished, I would advocate for these people to receive mandatory exposure to the lives and communities of other citizens within the community while continually being under watch. This would be something that, say, would require somebody who is of Malay descent to spend time in, say, vernacular schools or otherwise, Chinese people to spend time in mosques, and for government officials and civil society to mediate, moderate, and neutralize tensions in religious contexts that are apart from their own, to observe how people do things while at the same time having these people do community service in places where they will have to develop relationships with people of different backgrounds from them within the community or to have shock exposure to the communities that these people purport to hate or whose values that they claim are profoundly different from their own. 

C. Communication.

Perception is profoundly important and ensuring that people perceive these measures in the correct way is necessary. 

However compassionate or inclusive our government projects itself to be, it will never succeed unless it actually conducts town hall sessions and actual communication with its constituents, or can be seen by the average citizen of Malaysia to genuinely be doing so. 

Which means, doing stuff like Reddit AMAs, making YouTube videos, or actually engaging in such a way that at the very least people can see that they are not lying through their teeth while claiming that they are engaging when actually they are not.

Here we come to the next part – civil society.

Civil society: 

A. Education 

I think that Malaysia needs to have a minimum level of education in order to deal with the manipulations of online content. 

This will be slow but it will pay dividends. 

I would consider as key deliverables: 

I) Mandatory video content to be watched at each appropriate level for all primary and secondary school students about religious harmony and the manipulations of misinformation and disinformation, with an emphasis on good habits.

II) Viral videos that people would actually watch and share of their own prerogative showcasing how people manipulate religion to suit their needs 

III) Key examples of misinformation and manipulation that may occur, as well as dialogue sessions on matters like emotional manipulation, for which teachers should be prepared to host and facilitate discussions rather than just parroting the material, and teachers can be graded on how well they actually conduct or facilitate sessions. 

Although schools exist at dramatically different levels, and therefore the first thing mentioned, meaning bolstering of an educational system that can raise students to the appropriate educational level first is also crucial.

B. NGOs

I believe that we should have an NGO ecosystem that does not just consist of people trying to supposedly fight for justice, compassion, and inclusion, but also direct and lobby the government to take action on certain matters such as fake news, religious riders, and otherwise, in such a way that this network of NGOs can exert systematic pressure on the government, are independent from the government, and may participate in the activities of the government, even as it is established that the funding from these organizations should not come from the government, or otherwise.

C. Citizens. 

It is key that we, on the individual level, should be immune to manipulations, but also have a bias towards action and towards challenging assumptions and narratives that do not align with what we see as correct views of the world. 

This means not being silent when people try to write on religion, and this does mean being willing to talk about topics that people would normally consider controversial for the simple reason that this conversation was never meant to be dominated by one single group, but instead participated in as part of a vibrant democratic discourse. 

It also does mean questioning our own assumptions and where we may personally fall short (do we personally discriminate? Do we personally avoid speaking the truth?), and having good personal traits or characteristics that dispose us towards participating in this conversation effectively, developing the skills as well as the culture that can facilitate that individually, with an aim towards cultivating it more broadly on the level of our society, thereby changing ourselves individually, that the world may change as well on the shoulders of our individual efforts.

Conclusion: 

This was a very long series of reflections, but it contains some of my ideas. 

To avoid our missing the forest for the trees though, this is what I want. 

I want a government regime that is fully equipped to punish people who want to exploit our democracy in a tremendously punishing and extreme way that will cause personal humiliation and establish extreme deterrence in the short term than to create a sustained benevolence through a legal framework that facilitates its continuation. 

Subsequent to that, I would bolster the government’s claims of being compassionate by establishing regular and sustained chains of communication between government and civil society rather than through performative actions that all Malaysians would easily see as pretentious and failing to live up to a basic standard of duty, which already is the status quo. 

These together can be built in our courts as well as with the entities that facilitate the production of speech being shared. 

I would then have government also collaborate with civil society in order to create a constant engagement, identification of needs, and the slow cultivation of a democratic immune system through education that not only involves talking at people but engaging with the intricacies of social media algorithms, blending that with government power, and also recruiting the very best of our civil society advocates in a continual way, recognising the enduring role of members of our society to uphold our own burdens in the realisation that individually we must be strong, that others may be strong as well, with the aim of creating a self-regulating society through a mixture of technology and appropriate homage to our human sides as we undertake the realisation that compassion is a nuanced topic and deepen our reflections beyond the standard and cliché notion of it as the allowance of everything under the sun. 

As Prime Minister Anwar once quoted, citing Joseph Stiglitz, who in turn cited Isaiah Berlin, “Freedom for the wolves has often meant death to the sheep.” 

To protect the flock, it is entirely understandable that we can eliminate the wolves while ensuring that instead of sheep, we have fully qualified and resilient human beings living in a system that will facilitate removal of the wolves among us at any point – this is the Malaysia towards which I hope we shall aspire, and what I hope we will in time reach.

– VT.

Leave A Comment

Recommended Posts

Harvard Derangement Syndrome

We all know the difficulties that Harvard has been going through, and I thought that it would be fun to showcase an actual Harvard perspective, so I’m sharing this free article from the New York Times to all of you written by Steven Pinker, from my own subscription.  It is well worth reading, and I hope you will enjoy it if you choose to read it!  Link: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/23/opinion/harvard-university-trump-administration.html?rsrc=ss&unlocked_article_code=1.KE8.FQW2.LxEovGin6Ef6&smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare Pinker is a disarming man. If you read his articles, they are quirky yet intellectually engaging. The man stuffs so many different facts into a single paragraph that it often makes me wonder how or whether he just has access to all of the ideas he does, articulating within a single hand wave expressions and fires of the most deeply interconnected set of neurons I may have ever witnessed on the planet.  Well, at least that’s what I feel having read Pinker for quite a number of years now – And not knowing that he was the Johnstone Professor of Psychology at Harvard University Well, that’s just a lack of attention to detail on my part, but it’s an interesting reality Sometimes people may have done or know far more than you might even think, perceive, or understand And sometimes these surprises can be rather fascinating.  Read the essay and it will give you a picture of what I understand about elite universities in the US at this point – Not exactly woke madrasas or the very headquarters of the CCP as President Trump seems to suggest, but instead as something rather different, definitely vibrant albeit with its flaws, where strident opinions are often shared, becoming the very voice of a generation through nothing more than the saliency bias and social media even amid an admitted climate where certain ideas are put to rest not because they are bad ones, but instead because […]

Royal Society Interview

Very honored to have the chance to interview the very first Malaysian scientist to join Britain’s Royal Society soon. Looking forward to meeting you soon, Ms. Ravigadevi! What questions should I ask and what are you curious about? Let me know down in the comments!

PKR Deputy Presidency Election Results Analysis

Some of you who follow me on YouTube know that I’ve been conducting some coverage of the PKR Deputy President elections featuring former deputy President Rafizi Ramli, and incoming deputy President Nurul Izzah. Sometimes it’s good to take a moment to think about the events that have happened over the course of the past, to understand things a little deeper, so I decided to do an analysis of the election results, which I’m sure many Malaysians were following. It is my first time doing this, and I will share my thought process along the way. When I look at the vote totals and also who got how many votes, I realize that we have been told earlier that there were about 32,030 people who were eligible to vote. Yet, at the same time, when we added together the votes cast for Rafizi and also Nurul Izzah, the total was only 13,669. This was a 42.7% turnout. Now, this was significantly better compared to previous PKR elections during which the turnouts ranged from about 10–15%. But thinking about that made me realize something important: Firstly, Nurul Izzah only has about 30% of the vote and she does not have a strong mandate. Second of all, this system made it so that what we see seems to be a highly improbable result. Now, some of you may know that PKR recently moved over to a delegate system. The way that it works is that there are 220 divisions of PKR and they all select a certain number of delegates to end up making up the total pool of people who are eligible to vote. In other words, this is not a random sample – This is not the general population. Indeed, if it were, and we were dealing with just your average everyday social media poll, it is almost a foregone conclusion that […]

SHOCKING NEWS FROM HARVARD

Sepupus, it’s not every day that I am genuinely shocked by a piece of news.  It’s also not every day that I feel compelled to use an O.O react on Instagram.  Today’s news gave me both opportunities in a double-whammy perfect storm.  The Trump administration will be revoking Harvard’s ability to enroll international students.  You might think that this is a simple matter that affects just one generation of students, as Singapore’s Calvin Cheng hinted, but no, that’s not the case. It affects multiple generations of students, and not just the ones who are going over to Harvard, but also the ones who are currently there. Well, I know you all better than you think.  Most of you would probably immediately declare that this is unconscionable, an attack against freedom, a fight against the good of the world and the darkest evil – unstoppable sword, immovable shield, justice and destruction – the very recounting of the Bhagavad Gita itself by Robert J Oppenheimer (Harvard University 4.0 Summa Cum Laude I believe) himself when he said: At the time that Oppenheimer had recounted these ominous words, nobody had died and it all seemed like a test that would merely remain a test. Nothing really would happen, would it? The United States wouldn’t dare use the atom bomb, would it? Yet, on August 6, Little Boy dropped on Hiroshima, 80,000 people died. On August 9, Fat Man dropped on Nagasaki, 40,000 people died. Including long-term effects from radiation and injuries, the total death toll was estimated to be over 200,000. What happened with Harvard may very well be one of those proclamations, except in slightly less poetic language, but with no less damage, including to many personal friends and acquaintances from Malaysia and beyond.  Now, I know what some of you might say: FAFO.  F*** Around and Find Out. But I think it […]

Inevitable Hash Brown

In the journey of life, change is inevitable and I say that unironically. Why “unironically”? Because people have repeated “change is inevitable” to high heaven and it often comes off like a word hash brown, fresh off the shelf of a cooling rack; toasty, delicious, yet ultimately unhealthy, factually fast food language. Yet so as the hash brown is delicious, so is the language of ‘change is inevitable’, only to be appreciated if it is savored properly. If it seems a little strange to you that I’m writing about hash browns and change, know that it is for me too, but it is one of those changes I see from 2025 – the sort that involves taking on random streams of thought and fashioning them into the rivulets that add into a current that move forward, summing into a flow. I do wonder a little bit about whether there’s a consistent pattern though. I find that I’ve become a bit more thoughtful about things like these – that I have a higher discernment for what constitutes quality thoughts, while at the same time holding the small blessing of being able to evaluate things in light of a larger goal of social change and transformation through the development of content, ideas, and otherwise. It sometimes feels like I am in the middle of a grand dialectic with the world, one where I stand in the marginal territories of an evanescent frontier, fighting against a world that I do not want to come to pass, aiming to reshape it to my will. I think about so many things. Biology, willpower, society. Mind, hand, money. Power, politics, philosophy. Birth, life, age, death; competition, progress, history; nation, spirituality, world; destiny, history, legacy. It seems to me that these words now come out easily from me, not from the outer rim of the deeper examined mind, […]

Influencer

In Mensa events, one annoying character (generally ok person but annoying with an emphasis on the G) sometimes comes up to me and starts talking about my ‘influencer’ career and how I’m ‘influencing’ people in a presumptuous fashion, acting as if suddenly he is the be all and end all of ‘influence’. Well, he is not and he is lovably mediocre as far as I know so I’m not too concerned about that, but I think it’s certainly an interesting concept to explore. The concept of an ‘influencer’ is so interesting. In purely technical terms, an influencer influences, and the derivational morphology is inescapable; to be an influencer, you must surely influence. But the question naturally arises: What kind of influence do we mean here? After all, there are so many kinds, which the world almost invariably collapses into a few different and well defined stereotypes. The comedic genius who specializes in fun, short, but stupid skits? The dancing girl thirst trap using every single part of her body to try to get you to click the ‘follow’ button and oh by the way buy some lipstick with a 10% discount code and 15% commission? The travel blogger cum exercise guru here to teach you the vastness of Borobudur on a diet of tempeh and budu budu? There are so many kinds out there, all valid and all cool in their own way – the internet is a wonderful place with lots of incredible and talented people, after all, here to persuade you and to make their fortunes in ways inconceivable at the dawn of humanity and even now to members of an older generation who cannot deal with that idea in any way except to infantilize or look down upon it. To be fair, it is not entirely the older generation’s fault that they think that way, because many such […]